Back
Cosmetic Committee By Mr. Jomo Elg
Ladies and Gentlemen,

The year 2004 has not been a good year for all businesses in the cosmetics business due to depressed consumer sentiment. However, it is good news that, despite this hardship, not only domestic and foreign cosmetics companies but also a national research institute took a lead to draw up strategies to support advancement in the cosmetics industry and most of these strategies are now being finalized.

It¡¯s highly regarded that the Korean Food and Drug Administration has made a multitude of practical improvements, judging from the October 18, 2004 revisions introduced in the Functional Cosmetics Screening Regulations. Nevertheless, fundamental issues associated with functional cosmetics have not been resolved and difficulties experienced by the member companies of the EUCCK Cosmetics Committee still continue.

Moreover, even in case of functional cosmetics which have passed the screening, only phrases stipulated by Acts are allowed for usage in advertisements while usage of results from research and development activities are limited, assuming that they might lead to exaggerated advertising. Results of functional cosmetics screening should be allowed to be used in advertisements for consumers to make an informed choice. To this purpose, the current regulations on labeling and advertising stated in the Cosmetic Act that strictly restrict the scope of labeling and advertising except permissible phrases (positive list concept) should be improved to the ones that allows creative labeling and advertising to companies by establishing the scope of prohibited expressions only (negative list concept). By providing consumers with results of corporate investments into cosmetics research, consumers will make a right choice and a legal environment that encourages continuous R&D investment by companies will be nurtured.

With regard to the Korean government¡¯s recent move to expand the scope of functional cosmetics, the EUCCK Cosmetics Committee is deeply concerned that the unreasonable operation derived from the functional cosmetics scheme might become more widespread. The Committee would like to request the Korean government to take an innovative step and expand the scope of the efficacy and effect of general cosmetics, not of functional cosmetics, and to consider the abolition of the functional cosmetics system itself in a long term for the cosmetics industry.
Furthermore, the unrealistic regulations in terms of packaging methods and separated discharge marks put forth in the recycling policy continue to put a burden on the cosmetics industry. The Korean government is requested to consider differences among different industries in its execution of environmental policies in order not to limit creative activities of companies, and to support companies in their effort to build international competitiveness.

The EUCCK Cosmetics Committee hereby requests the Korean government to positively review this proposal that represents core system improvements in the Cosmetic Act encompassing the scope of labeling and advertising and in the Act for resources saving and recycling promotion. We hope all the regulations to be reviewed and revamped this year so that they meet rational and international standards.

Thank you.