Back
IPR Committee By Mr. Peter F. Thewlis
It is remarkable that a market as well developed as that of South Korea, the world¡¯s 12th largest economy, there should be such a high instance of infringement of Intellectual Property Rights. It is not as though Korea does not understand Intellectual Property; 328,000 intellectual property registrations were filed in 2004 ranking the country 4th in the world. And Korea recorded 3,536 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications ranking it 7th in the world.

With all this activity to protect its¡¯ Intellectual Property, in all fairness, one would expect a reciprocal arrangement in terms of protecting other¡¯s intellectual property. But this is not the case. Today on the streets of Seoul, Pusan, Daegu & Daejeon one can find a multitude of counterfeit or fake products; some are simple but blatant copies of international fashion designs, DVD¡¯s or software games, others like fake drugs, pharmaceuticals or auto-parts are much more harmful to our health & safety. Unfortunately, the people involved in the manufacture, distribution & selling of counterfeit brands are often also involved in the more harmful and downright dangerous manufacture, distribution & selling of fake drugs, pharmaceuticals and other consumer products. Clearly the Government needs to protect society from exposure to these dangers.

Some laws are in place, but they are not enforced. We ask the Korean authorities to increase their attention to IPR violations, to allocate manpower to enforcing the law at the local police level, and at the Prosecution level. We request that the Korean government focuses more on mass media actions aimed at the Korean public & consumers, stressing the illegality and seriousness of IPR infringement. We recommend that Korean law is modified to enable stiffer sanctions on IPR violators to be introduced.

A renewed approach to reducing IPR infringement with tangible results will encourage investment in Korea & help the Government to reach its ambition to be the Hub of North East Asia. Certainly without any improvements the country will not attract the Foreign direct investment which it seeks.